Mayor Joshi has secured support of five Council Members – Council President Nish Patel, Council Vice President Margot Harries, Councilman John Poyner (all three won election on Mayor Joshi’s ticket in 2021), Asaf Shmuel and Councilman Joseph Coyle to pass this changed ordinance. Only two council members – Councilman Richard Brescher and Councilman Ajay Patil were against the changed ordinance.
This proposal faced immediate opposition from residents who expressed concerns about increased access for minors, potential traffic congestion, and negative impacts on property values and the community’s character.
The public’s response was swift and vocal, with a Change.org petition opposing the expansion garnering nearly 5000 signatures in less than four days. Council President Nish Patel initially supported the ordinance but later withdrew it from a scheduled vote due to the overwhelming public backlash.
Despite this, questions arose regarding potential conflicts of interest, five council members were firm to pass the ordinance but after further push from two opposing council members and public, council voted down the Cannabis Ordinance.
Now the fear is Council members Nish Patel, Margot Harries and John Poyner chose not to seek another term, it is likely this ordinance will resurface after June 10 primary election.
Former Councilwoman Joyce Ship Freeman explains the original intent:
Former Councilwoman Joyce Ship Freeman explains the impact on the community:
Cannabis petitioner’s frustration and comment on Council Presidents attempt to create a subcommittee:
Cannabis petitioner’s frustration:
Residents explaining why Cannabis shop are detrimental to the communities:
Resident involved in youth education explaining the seriousness of Cannabis issue:
Resident questioning Council President’s stand on cannabis:
Resident explaining interaction with school going kids and fear:
Resident questioning who is there to protect their interest:
Edison Resident questioning revenue and expenses
Resident living close to proposed zone explaining the impact:
Edison Resident’s attempt to explain council on other side impacts